Alternative to Jira Project Planning

Alternative to Jira Project Planning
Alternative to Jira Project Planning

One of the greatest tools for agile project management, JIRA is far more than mere bug monitoring and team management applications. 

Atlassian’s JIRA is a widely used project management platform for software development teams.

It has over 30 million users globally and is developed to assist Agile teams in planning, building, tracking development, logging problems, and releasing applications early and frequently.

Simultaneously, no one-size-fits-all approach can satisfy everyone’s particular business needs; like every other tool, Jira has certain pitfalls that lead many consumers to seek JIRA alternatives.

10 Alternative to Jira Project Planning

There are a variety of JIRA alternatives on the market. Here is a list of the top 10 most well-known JIRA alternatives:


Backlog is a project management application developed especially for developers. Provides a cloud-hosted approach suitable for those in the software development company.

It provides mechanisms for improving teamwork, coordination, and agile implementation of projects across a wide range of teams. 

Its strongest feature is its task management framework, which allows users to build task structures, divide assignments into core tasks and subtasks, and make checklists, progress notes, benchmarks, and other custom fields. 

It’s a common alternative to Jira with a simplified and more user-friendly interface. Ability to create wikis for information sharing and exposure.

Used by development teams to collaborate with other teams for better team coordination and high-quality project execution. 

Key Features:

  • Gantt Charts 
  • Simple bug tracking software 
  • Keep all files in one location.
  • Drag and drop file attachments
  • Create, allocate, and upgrade tasks
  • Set deadlines to keep work on track.
  • Divide activities into subtasks and build checklists.
  • Warnings for new problems through push notifications

Pros of using Backlog:

  • Gantt chart
  • Support Github 
  • Simplicity, manageability, and usability. 
  • It is a user-friendly tool for designers and programmers.
  • All required functions are available, and the interface is simple to use. 

Cons of using Backlog: 

  • GUIs can be made more user-friendly. 
  • For small teams and departments with short-term contracts, the cost is quite high.


TargetProcess is a popular Agile project management platform that supports Scrum, Kanban, or customized approaches. 

It allows managers to see schedules, dependencies, project details, and more while increasing accountability and visibility around the board to make organizing, coordination, and monitoring easier. It has an easy-to-use interface for interactive app development.

It’s a perfect substitute for JIRA. It’s a free Jira alternative that lets you use Scrum, Kanban, or a personalized Agile strategy. 

Key Features:

  • Backlog story map view 
  • Quality assurance, bug fixing, and test case management.
  • Sprint preparation and release planning.
  • Planning and monitoring at the highest rate through the entire portfolio
  • It is an excellent platform for Agile testing and quality-focused teams.
  • Assists in the evaluation of the success of various programs and teams. 

Pros of using TargetProcess:

  • New updates are well supported.
  • Views can be customized to a certain degree. 
  • It enables us to use graphical and personalized reports to identify specific patterns. 

Cons of using TargetProcess: 

  • Working can be a little challenging. 
  • It’s a little difficult to figure out how to use the API. 
  • It’s simple to construct duplicate jobs, but it’s hard to figure dependencies.


Assembla offers a centralized location for project managers and developers to handle projects and programming together in one area without paying for additional add-ons. 

It is a younger platform than JIRA, but it has a wider variety of features in its main product, such as git hosting, code release, agile tools, and time monitoring.

This software is developed for the teams who create creative software and is famous among phone apps, video games, and robot designers.

Key Features:

  • It has hourly backups. 
  • Subversion and git hosting 
  • Bug tracking service is easy to use.
  • Management of Project Portfolios.
  • It helps users to address problems using a range of workflows. 
  • Assembla has various sharing features to keep knowledge circulating within teams.
  • With user feedback and card view functionality, it can catch up with changes in specifications or goals.

Pros of using Assembla:

  • It is highly adaptable and simple to use. 
  • It helps developers with real-time analytics. 
  • It’s a cloud-based system that is accessible from any location. 
  • It enables us to configure projects depending on our requirements and to collaborate with Agile and Scrum methodologies. 

Cons of using Assembla:

  • Needs to enhance the mobile platform.
  • For first-time consumers, it is a little complicated to use. 
  • There is no simple way to organize projects, monitor bugs, etc. 


VersionOne is a cloud-based agile software solution that assists companies in engaging partners and tracking and reporting through different product portfolios, projects, and programs. 

It provides various applications and functions for dealing with different software development models’ complexities.

VersionOne is a flexible tool for agile projects of all sizes and scopes and is currently available for the finest JIRA alternatives. 

It offers you a high-level summary of product preparation, product releasing, sprint planning, and monitoring.

Key Features:

  • It is easy to use and quickly integrates all teams.
  • Delivers results based on business objectives.
  • Keeping track of all feature requests in one location. 
  • An all-in-one agile tool for preparing all of your stories.
  • Keeps you up to speed with the status of your project in real-time. 
  • Improves visibility, knowledge sharing, and project management. 

Prof of using VersionOne:

  • The tool is appropriate for a small project.
  • Dashboard is simple to use once it is set up. 
  • Team rooms are excellent for preparation and recording purposes.
  • Changes are automatically saved, and no files are lost as it is saved in real-time. 
  • These include a simple data download process, well-developed evaluating and monitoring systems, and wonderfully designed filters. 

Cons of using VersionOne:

  • The Search feature should be improved. 
  • For first-time consumers, it is a little complicated to use. 


Hive is a project management tool that makes it simple to keep track of your work. This software helps you use over 1000 integrations, such as Gmail, Dropbox, and Google Drive. 

It facilitates teamwork and project planning through chat, work scheduling, workflow, and file sharing.

You can see a list of a person’s or group’s success and efficiency rate. This feature will help you find bottlenecks and problematic areas in your workflows and address them as quickly as practicable.

Hive’s approach allows you to concentrate on main projects while ensuring work is completed on schedule. If there are deficiencies in the team’s efficiency, you will be notified in real-time. 

Key Features:

  • It is an overview of the project.
  • You can comfortably work for anyone. 
  • The software has a range of simple-to-use models. 
  • You can keep track of and update your projects in real-time.
  • Project or plan the team’s time for existing and future projects.
  • Create a table, schedule, or Gantt map to coordinate your idea.

Pros of using Hive:

  • Its compatibility with Hadoop.
  • It is really easy to install and use. 
  • Several users can query at the same time.
  • It has a straightforward and clear user interface. 
  • Ability to manage vast volumes of data and the method of querying it. 

Cons of using Hive:

  • Does not support subqueries.
  • It is essential to add or modify features. 
  • The user interface is outdated and inefficient. 


Workzone is a project management software that provides document management, project sharing, personalized documentation, resource and activity planning, and time monitoring.

Users can view cross-project overviews, which provide the company access to project resources, and automated and customized project to-do lists, allowing them to see what’s coming on each project at a glance. 

Offers project details at varying levels of depth to fit multiple user functions on the project. The tool provides team-specific models for activities and assignments, so they don’t have to build from zero every time they start a new project. 

Key Features:

  • Reports on workload
  • Time monitoring
  • Simple file sharing
  • Each team has its workspace.
  • Templates for assignments and activities
  • Task dependencies and customized to-do lists

Pros of using Workzone:

  • Assembles the list of projects.
  • Specifies who is in charge of the project.
  • Highly secure channel that ensures the confidentiality of all user data. 
  • Quite an appealing user interface that is easy to understand for new users 

Cons of using Workzone:

  • The price is not disclosed.
  • Manually shifting dates becomes problematic if dependencies between tasks are disrupted. is a popular Jira alternative since it is designed for companies of all sizes and is filled with teamwork and project management functionality. 

It is a cloud-based Work Operating System that enables teams to easily build workflow applications to handle their processes, programs, and day-to-day activities.

This highly flexible PM approach comes with several innovative features to help work teams perform better.

The redesigned and improved version of the popular PM startup is highly intuitive, customizable, adaptive, and versatile, making it the preferred platform over rivals. 

Key Features:

  • survey
  • Updates are pertinent.
  • Keywords and tags
  • Keeping track of timelines.
  • Email reminders.
  • Workflow management
  • Workflow supervision 
  • Project-specific time tracking 

Pros of using

  • Several integrations
  • Excellent tracking capabilities 
  • Workflows that can be customized
  • Onboarding is easy and transparent
  • Effective project coordination and management. 

Cons of using

  • Upgrading the mobile versions takes some time.
  • The layout is weak and complicated to set up and maintain. 


Wrike serves as a central center for team coordination and knowledge sharing that displays various tasks in a single view compared to JIRA, which provides a different dashboard for each workflow. 

It provides resources that allow users to enhance the planning process, coordinate interaction, and optimize workflow while being physically separated.

Being a dynamic platform that provides a multi-dimensional project approach to groups of all sizes. You can quickly monitor the success of any of your team’s projects through real-time monitoring. 

Recognizing bottlenecks in the process allows you to fix or eliminate the mishaps quickly. It assures that everyone understands each task by supplying in-context information in the form of images, tables, graphs, or folders. 

Key Features:

  • Flexible dashboards 
  • Collaboration and Reporting
  • Customizable consumer groups 
  • Task-based time scheduling flexible dashboards
  • Share informative reports daily, and plan updates. 
  • View real-time project updates and progress for your group.

Pros of using Wrike:

  • Portfolio administration
  • Services can be strengthened.
  • Customization options are available.
  • Collaboration among members of a community.
  • Task scheduling and monitoring
  • Easy to use, with an easy-to-navigate user interface. 

Cons of using Wrike:

  • It isn’t easy to integrate new staff.
  • Overall, the interface is not as pleasing as rivals’. 
  • It takes time to set up and needs the assistance of a Wrike specialist.

Zoho Project

Zoho Project includes features for teamwork such as assignments, work lists, and milestones.

This toolset set assists you in planning the work to assure project completion on schedule. 

Zoho Project also provides detailed perspectives from the workflows. To make information easier to interpret, the app analyses data in graphs and maps. 

You can then identify possibilities, find bottlenecks, update tasks, and optimize the workflows. Time monitoring allows you to keep track of your team members’ billable and non-billable hours and remain on schedule. 

Key Features:

  • For resource control, a broad range of graphs and reports are available.
  • Timesheets are used to decide each team member’s time to a particular mission and to identify problems in the process. 
  • Gantt maps are used to illustrate and monitor the progress of a project.
  • Easily detect and address issues, problem monitoring and detailed documentation are used. 

Pros of using the Zoho Project:

  • Gives you more flexibility in customizing your tasks.
  • There is no limit on the number of projects that can be built.
  • It detects bugs and prevents them as soon as they are discovered. 
  • Its user interface is easy and intuitive, making it simple to understand. 
  • It has flexible pricing choices that are adjusted to the scale of the team. 

Cons of using Zoho Project:

  • It’s not an intuitive interface.
  • Dashboards need more customization.
  • It is rarely buggy and struggles from service outages. 

Mavenlink is a great software that combines project scheduling, time monitoring, resource allocation, and other functions into a single application. 

It is a tool created exclusively for service organizations to engage with individuals, generate projects, and benefit.

It provides a simple, easy-to-use platform for handling all of your team’s and project’s activities.

To establish a more streamlined workflow, you can integrate it with other business software and frameworks, such as Slack, QuickBooks, and G Suite.

It offers a 10-day free trial and membership plans like a team, professionals, premier, businesses, and personalized pricing plans depending on the company’s needs. 

Key Features:

  • Gantt Charts
  • Sharing of files 
  • Personnel planning 
  • SSL encryption
  • Team Collaboration 
  • Quality analysis using advanced analytics
  • Accounting for tasks and teamwork
  • Project and time management 
  • Email and Google integration
  • It offers a reliable monitoring service for resource details.
  • It acts as a directory for all project material.
  • Capacity management is reliable and easy to execute.
  • Mavenlink’s monitoring capability is comprehensive, and it has given much greater insight into our project
  • Lack of intuition interface
  • Features can be prohibitively expensive for small and medium-sized companies.


JIRA is a decent platform for personal use and is one of the best tools, but it also has flaws. Jira has high price plans, a complex configuration, and little support for multiple assignees. At the same time, alternatives to JIRA have a variety of advantages, including a reasonable cost.

Above listed Jira alternatives are the best available in the current market. All you have to do now is evaluate your requirements and choose one option that best meets them. 

You May Also Like